http://antiwar-talk.com/ Discuss antiwar news and viewpoints en-US Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:05:16 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://antiwar-talk.com/search.php http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=149#post-345 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:18:25 +0000 smithy 345@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Falsification of passports is a modern version of the "Trojan Horse". </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=149#post-344 Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:04:59 +0000 smithy 344@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>"I ring alarm bells. Israel is falsifying Western passports on a large scale. We discover forged passports on a daily basis," said Dubai police Chief Gen. Dahi Khalfan Tamim on Tuesday.</p> <p>"The world must stop an operation of vast falsification of official documents (that) a formal body (Israel's spy agency Mossad) is carrying out," he added. </p> <p><a href="http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=120432&amp;sectionid=351020205" rel="nofollow">http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=120432&amp;sectionid=351020205</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=76#post-343 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:17:51 +0000 hooch21 343@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Mr. Kellerman was the other secret service man in the car with the president that day in dallas. Here is an excerpt from his testimony before the warren commission. Notice that he describes bang-bang.</p> <p>Mr. Specter.<br /> Now, in your prior testimony you described a flurry of shells into the car. How many shots did you hear after the first noise which you described as sounding like a firecracker?<br /> Mr. Kellerman.<br /> Mr. Specter, these shells came in all together.<br /> Mr. Specter.<br /> Are you able to say how many you heard?<br /> <strong><br /> Mr. Kellerman.<br /> I am going to say two, and it was like a double bang--bang, bang.<br /> </strong><br /> Mr. Specter.<br /> You mean now two shots in addition to the first noise?<br /> Mr. Kellerman.<br /> Yes, sir; yes, sir; at least.<br /> Mr. Specter.<br /> What is your best estimate of the time, in seconds, from the first noise sounding like a firecracker until the second noise which you heard?<br /> Mr. Kellerman.<br /> This was instantaneous.</p> <p><a href="http://www.jfk-assassination.de/warren/wch/vol2/page76.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.jfk-assassination.de/warren/wch/vol2/page76.php</a></p> <p>Go back and look at the zapruder film, see if you cant easily match this sound sequence "bang,pause,pause,pause,bang-bang" to the images you see. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=76#post-342 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:07:52 +0000 hooch21 342@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Will Greer was the driver of the car carring president kennedy that day in dallas. Here is an excerpt of his testimony to the warren commission. The last two shots he heard sounded to be simultaneous with each other....</p> <p>Mr. Specter.<br /> To the best of your ability to recollect and estimate, how much time elapsed from the first noise which you have described as being similar to the backfire of a motor vehicle until you heard the second noise?<br /> Mr. Greer.<br /> It seems a matter of seconds, I really couldn't say. Three or four seconds.<br /> Mr. Specter.<br /> How much time elapsed, to the best of your ability to estimate and recollect, between the time of the second noise and the time of the third noise?<br /> <strong><br /> Mr. Greer.<br /> The last two seemed to be just simultaneously, one behind the other, but I don't recollect just how much, how many seconds were between the two. I couldn't really say.<br /> </strong><br /> Mr. Specter.<br /> Describe as best you can the types of sound of the second report, as distinguished from the first noise which you said was similar to a motorcycle backfire?<br /> Mr. Greer.<br /> The second one didn't sound any different much than the first one but I kind of got, by turning around, I don't know whether I got a little concussion of it, maybe when it hit something or not, I may have gotten a little concussion that made me think there was something different to it. But so far as the noise is concerned, I haven't got any memory of any difference in them at all.<br /> Mr. Specter.<br /> Describe as best you can the sound of the third noise.<br /> Mr. Greer.</p> <p><a href="http://www.jfk-assassination.de/warren/wch/vol2/page118.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.jfk-assassination.de/warren/wch/vol2/page118.php</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=148#post-341 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:25:36 +0000 smithy 341@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p><a href="http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=120085&amp;sectionid=351020502" rel="nofollow">http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=120085&amp;sectionid=351020502</a></p> <p>"The only thing is that he must respect the constitution," he went on to say, adding that Egypt "does not need a new hero," AFP quoted him as saying.</p> <p>ElBaradei, who has gained prominence over his tenure as the chief of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has reportedly said, however, that he would run for his country's presidency provided that the constitution is amended.</p> <p>The former IAEA chief has formed the National Association for Change in Egypt and described the ruling government as 'undemocratic.'</p> <p>He has also said that it would not take long before the country finds 'real' democratic changes. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=76#post-340 Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:35:43 +0000 hooch21 340@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>John Kennedy was killed by <strong>two almost simulataneous shots to the head. One shot came from the back and the second shot came from the right front.</strong></p> <p>If you start and stop this slow motion video you will see the first shot pushes kennedys head forward and the red matter is sprayed forward. When the second shot hits, a half second later, kennedys head is thrust violently to the back and left. </p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_hDakTz2I</a></p> <p>In this video you will see that Kennedys wife actually climbs onto the trunk of the car to retrieve a piece of the presidents brain matter.</p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVfIh-8nXyQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVfIh-8nXyQ</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=147#post-339 Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:22:05 +0000 smithy 339@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>"The pen is mightier than the sword". Make it so scotty! </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=147#post-338 Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:08:31 +0000 smithy 338@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>They know how to put an end to so called "extra-judicial killings". Committing a murder in someone else country if pretty close to the top when it comes to arrogance. When that country depends on tourism it makes it worse. </p> <p><a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2010/03/03/dubai-arrest-warrant-against-netanyahu-expected-later-this-week/" rel="nofollow">http://news.antiwar.com/2010/03/03/dubai-arrest-warrant-against-netanyahu-expected-later-this-week/</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=146#post-337 Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:55:14 +0000 smithy 337@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>This is why either everyone has nukes or no one has nukes...</p> <p>"With her four nuclear submarines in the south Atlantic, she's threatening to unleash an atomic weapon against Argentina if I don't provide her with the secret codes that will make the missiles we sold the Argentinians deaf and blind."</p> <p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/nov/22/books.france" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/nov/22/books.france</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=145#post-336 Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:49:12 +0000 teodoru 336@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Jessica Lynch was McChrystal's first cow paddy; then there was his sacrilegious submersion of Pat Tillman's death into BS. Now Operation Moshtarak in Marjah is put before as a people to people build-not-destroy operation. But in fact, McChrystal's whole song is a big lie because we do not have the troop density needed to secure ANY of the countryside. As a result it can be seen that McChrystal is a typical bang-em-up kinetic guy out for ops that maximize body count (theirs) and minimize casualties (ours). </p> <p>So where's the fraud this time? </p> <p>Well, recalling Vietnam, it is clear that what McChrystal won't admit is that we're not supposed to be doing counter-insurgency but rather, once again, counter-revolution. So what "revolution" does McChrystal offer as an alternative to the Radical Islamic one the Taliban offers? His Aug09 report promises a bloodless "security" campaign for civilians. But does anyone doubt that if forced to choose between what Americans have been doing to Afghanistan for the last near decade and what the Taliban has to offer in a plebiscite they would chose the Taliban's offer? Why?</p> <p>To answer this question, imagine how you would feel if you went to a surgeon for a belly ache and he insists that it's your gallbladder and it must come out. Then he tries to get to it from the back instead of from the front. He finds a kidney in the way and tells your family he has to remove it. Reluctantly they consent but after removing the kidney he gets so tangled in guts that he closes up and decides he’d better study more anatomy before going back in. Luckily you survive and insist that he never step near you. But he insists that his reputation as a surgeon is at stake so you must allow him to try again or he’ll slap you with a lawsuit for damage to his professional status. Would you put your life again in his hands? Would you give in if he reported that, with a gun to their heads, he got the majority of your family to agree to let him go back in?</p> <p>Obama's moral character is dubious indeed, given his submission to Petraeus/McChrystal hooey because he's stuck with having said that the real war is in Afghanistan in order not to look dovish when insisting in the presidential campaign that we should leave Iraq. But fact is that we can't hold any nation hostage because alQaeda had been near there. In fact, our goal in Afghanistan is not to stop alQaeda but to run pipelines from the oil&amp;gas rich "stans" above Afghanistan to Pakistani ports and on to market. As with Iraq, once again, it's blood for oil. I'd gladly debate Exum and the "scholarly" peanut gallery around Petraeus that so deifies him like a rock star's groupie fan club. There are far more knowledgeable European sources—that don’t classify even the toilet paper "top secret"-- which have shown that we can't control 2000 years old tribal conflicts in Afghanistan. Yet McChrystal claims to "secure" the countryside with 1/10th the men that the<br /> army's own COIN Manual insists he’d need for even the least theoretical chance of success. Exum et.al like to pretend they are honest by admitting that "we're losing." But then they insist that "we can win." How, when you don't have the troop density to secure the countryside?</p> <p>If we really wanted to beat Taliban’s revolution we would remember how we beat the Viet Cong's. Though we had far more troops density we mercilessly pounded the countryside with ordnance, killing millions because we didn’t know better, yet. But the millions that survived took refuge in the cities where the VC had no infrastructure. Westmoreland murderously turned South Vietnam from 85% rural to 75% urban. What happened is that the guerrilla "fish" were left high and dry by the peasant "sea" that took refuge in the cities and with help from CORDS, in the words of Radio Hanoi, "became petites bourgeois?" That's why Hanoi had to resort to a hopeless Tet Offensive.</p> <p>Not that we should resort to the kind of mass murder the US military is famous for in order to keep down its casualties, but we could create from scratch NATO-run cities in Northwest Afghanistan. There we would attract the youth with housing, education and real jobs in a manufacturing economy that would support the nation when we leave. Urban modernization would thus be our revolution in response to the Taliban's. The money young Afghans send to their families would speak louder than the Taliban Koran verses. We have more than enough troop density to secure a few NATO-made cities, even if we give up on our oil&amp;gas pipe-dreams.</p> <p>From Petraeus's PhD thesis to McChrystal's report to Obama we have much evidence of the cognitive dullness of our "yes sir" military command. Their kind of brawny soldiers are made to kill using simple tactics to do it and it shows in their writings-- as well as in the babble of their peanut gallery of "scholars." Never facing debate they are too used to making fraudulent affirmations and then hiding their errors as military secrets. They have much to pay for their crime of negligence sending our mom and dad soldiers to war intel blind, language deaf and culture dumb. The only thing our troops were given is lots of is bullets so for McChrystal to now say that they're going to stop the killing of civilians is more of the stuff from which is made his Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman cover-ups for incompetent "friendly fire" killing of our own. It's time for Obama to decide on a counter-revolutionary goal rather than hide behind a plagiarized COIN Manuel. Our<br /> Chicken-manure academics ought to earn their status demanding MEANINGFUL DIALOGUE and responsible debate in which to apply their famous “critical judgment” and expertise as they did in the 1960s Vietnam War teach-ins. Only through meaningful dialogue can we save our nation from Rumsfeldian psychobabble and Bush-it, in which Petraeus/McChrystal learned to swim dazzling the media. Obama is a new breed and he better open the debate to public scrutiny if he wants public support and patience without ending up as a one term president. We must end our "ain't my kid going to war" disconnect syndrome. Americans are too willing to send OUR mom and dad soldiers in repeated tour until they die and should show their patriotism by not allowing incompetent media-oriented commanders to do to OUR kids what Americans wouldn't allow the Pentagon to do with their biological kids just so we can fill-er-up our SUVs cheap. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=121#post-335 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:27:27 +0000 trucks 335@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Dito ! Now what do we do ? </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=144#post-334 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:26:56 +0000 Spartan 117 334@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Please come and explain why are you against war if you are. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=121#post-333 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:14:35 +0000 Spartan 117 333@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>yeah and in the poorer countries their leaders gas them, cut their heads off and let them starve while they live in lavish mansions. Yeah what a great "free" life. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=139#post-332 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:11:54 +0000 Spartan 117 332@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>why are you against the iraq war and war in general? just wondering. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=76#post-331 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:21:47 +0000 hooch21 331@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>The main stream media exerts a lot of energy to keep the "lone gunman" conspiracy theory alive. In all cases their attempts can easily be refuted by simple things like actually reading the testimony in the warren commissions report or by a very simple photograph. </p> <p>For instance here is a mainstream media attempt to convince that badgeman could not be real...<br /> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtOCJplSLf8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtOCJplSLf8</a></p> <p>But the conclusions of that video can easily be refuted by simply looking at the following picture<br /> <a href="http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/arnold2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/arnold2.htm</a></p> <p>The importance of badgeman to the subject of this thread will soon become apparant. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=143#post-330 Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:55:43 +0000 smithy 330@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>His confession was televised. That means the entire iranian nation knows about, not to mention people of pakistan, afghanistan and the rest of the middle east.</p> <p><strong>I have been looking for news of his capture on american media for 2 days but i have not found anything, why is that?</strong></p> <p>"In a televised confession on Press TV, Rigi said that in a Dubai meeting with CIA agents, he was promised unlimited support that included a military base anywhere near the Iranian border equipped with weaponry and training facilities."</p> <p><a href="http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=119474&amp;sectionid=351020101" rel="nofollow">http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=119474&amp;sectionid=351020101</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=143#post-329 Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:50:40 +0000 smithy 329@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Just as a reminder, in 1953 the cia overthrew the then elected president of iran so it is not hard to accept that the above confession might indeed be true. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=143#post-328 Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:47:18 +0000 smithy 328@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>If these allegations are true then the united states government is has broken its own terrorism laws by providing material support to a terrorist organization.</p> <p>"After Obama was elected, the Americans contacted us and they met me in Pakistan.They met us after clashes with my group around March 17 in (the southeastern city of) Zahedan, and he (the US operative) said that Americans had requested a meeting."</p> <p>"I said we didn't have any time for a meeting and if we do help them they should promise to give us aid. They said they would cooperate with us and will give me military equipment, arms and machine guns. They also promised to give us a base along the border with Afghanistan next to Iran."</p> <p>"They asked to meet me and we said where should we meet you and he said in Dubai. We sent someone to Dubai and we told a person to ask a place for myself in Afghanistan from the area near the operations and they complied that they would sort out the problem for us and they will find Mr. Rigi a base and guarantee his own security in Afghanistan or in any of the countries adjacent to Iran so that he can carry on his operations.</p> <p>"They told me that in Kyrgyzstan they have a base called Manas near Bishkek, and that a high-ranking person was coming to meet me and that if such high-ranking people come to the United Arab Emirates, they may be observed by intelligence people but in a place like Bishkek this high-ranking American person could come and we could reach an agreement on making personal contacts. But after the last major operation we took part in, they said that they wanted to meet with us.</p> <p>"The Americans said Iran was going its own way and they said our problem at the present is Iran… not al-Qaeda and not the Taliban, but the main problem is Iran. We don't have a military plan against Iran. Attacking Iran is very difficult for us (the US). The CIA is very particular about you and is prepared to do anything for you because our government has reached the conclusion that there was nothing Americans could do about Iran and only I could take care of the operations for them.</p> <p>"One of the CIA officers said that it was too difficult for us to attack Iran militarily, but we plan to give aid and support to all anti-Iran groups that have the capability to wage war and create difficulty for the Iranian (Islamic) system. They reached the conclusion that your organization has the power to create difficulties for the Islamic Republic and they are prepared to give you training and/or any assistance that you would require, in terms of telecommunications security and procedures as well as other support, the Americans said they would be willing to provide it at an extensive level." </p> <p><a href="http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=119481&amp;sectionid=351020101" rel="nofollow">http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=119481&amp;sectionid=351020101</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=142#post-327 Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:01:06 +0000 smithy 327@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Just battling in the blogoshpere is not getting anywhere. All of the best bloggers need to start organizing real people in real protests. Just writing about it does nothing except satifying the vicarious rebel inside of us, and somehow we think that if we have read and we have written we have done enough.</p> <p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/02/23/newsweek/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/02/23/newsweek/index.html</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=141#post-326 Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:28:55 +0000 smithy 326@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Iran and Qatar signed defense agreement on Wednesday.</p> <p>The agreement was inked by Defense Minister Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi and Qatar's Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Hamad bin Ali al-Attiyah in the first day of Vahidi's trip to Qatar.</p> <p>Exchanging technical delegations, expanding bilateral educational cooperation, fighting against terrorism and elements of insecurity are among articles of the agreement.</p> <p>The two sides also stressed their will to put the agreement into practice as a step for establishment of peace and security in the strategic and sensitive region of Persian Gulf. </p> <p><a href="http://www.news.az/articles/9987" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.az/articles/9987</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=140#post-325 Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:09:55 +0000 Gandhirocks 325@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>haha, I'm not surprised, I mean we supported Bin Laden about 15-20 years ago. But the fact that Iran arrested the man will give the US government an excuse to say that he isn't a terrorist. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=140#post-324 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:23:26 +0000 smithy 324@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>The us has a history of supporting terrorists when it suits their political agenda...</p> <p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/7300767/Iran-arrests-most-wanted-man-after-police-board-civilian-flight.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/7300767/Iran-arrests-most-wanted-man-after-police-board-civilian-flight.html</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=76#post-323 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:09:26 +0000 hooch21 323@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>You can almost convince yourself that badgeman is real if you download the moorman photo and bring into some image processing software like Paint.Net and then zoom the relevant area of the photo.</p> <p>Back when "Badgeman" was discovered (1982) not many people had access to image processing software. Today it probably comes as a default with most computers. If you dont have it you can download a very good free version Paint.Net. </p> <p><strong>First</strong> download the moorman photograph. You want the full version (the one with the fingerprint easily seen on it). </p> <p><strong>Second</strong> load the photograph into you image processing software.</p> <p><strong>Third</strong> watch the first 10 seconds of this video to find out what portion of the photo you have to enlarge </p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn1-dy5-Ebs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hn1-dy5-Ebs</a></p> <p>Then play around. Enalarge that area. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=139#post-322 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:17:33 +0000 smithy 322@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>How about this <a href="http://www.peaceblimp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.peaceblimp.com/</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=139#post-321 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:01:42 +0000 Gandhirocks 321@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>So I am extremely against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I was just wondering if you guys know of any organizations or websites that coordinate protests or some kind of action against war. I mean we can all come on this forum and write about how bad war is, or we can read the anti war blog, but this doesn't make a very big difference, the wars will still continue. At this point, I'm just frustrated that the wars are continuing, and I want to do something about it.</p> <p>Thank you! =) </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=137#post-320 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:19:46 +0000 smithy 320@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>In some ways the American media is the most corrupt in the world. Our constitution, which guarantees freedom of the press ,does not impose any obligation on the press to be truthful. Once you couple that freedom of the press with outside(foreign) ownership of the press you have a situation ripe for mis-information on matters that are important to the elite.</p> <p>It is up to us to be the watchdogs of the press. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=138#post-319 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:58:20 +0000 smithy 319@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>"Iran's intelligence minister says the leader of Jundallah terrorist group was at a US base in Afghanistan 24 hours before his capture, in possession of a US-issued, forged Afghan passport."</p> <p><a href="http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=119318&amp;sectionid=351020101" rel="nofollow">http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=119318&amp;sectionid=351020101</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=137#post-318 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:17:24 +0000 krazkr 318@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Al-qaeda is presented now as the resolvable threat to handle in Arabia and not as well Yemen. They are training here. We are no longer being informed of threats from Iran, We are supposed to get paranoid about that. Iran is the selfish killer nation again.</p> <p>My point of view is that more could be said about the peaceful vs. violent intentions that exist there for terrorism or anti-terrorism. </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=136#post-317 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:17:09 +0000 smithy 317@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p><a href="http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=119237&amp;sectionid=351020202" rel="nofollow">http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=119237&amp;sectionid=351020202</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=135#post-316 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:36:18 +0000 smithy 316@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>You can tell a lot about a person by the internet page that he raves about!</p> <p><a href="http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2010/02/whos-afraid-of-interposition.html" rel="nofollow">http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2010/02/whos-afraid-of-interposition.html</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=135#post-315 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:35:47 +0000 smithy 315@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>This is a better link. It will last longer on the internet.</p> <p>This is one internet page that I believe should be preserved for eternity!</p> <p><a href="http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2010/02/whos-afraid-of-interposition.html" rel="nofollow">http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2010/02/whos-afraid-of-interposition.html</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=135#post-314 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:27:03 +0000 smithy 314@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>It also shows us the difference between lawful and unlawful disposition. When the interveening becomes dis-proportonate and thus unlawful....</p> <p>"Newt interposed to protect his friend's horse; Woodrow intervened with righteous violence to protect Newt from the Army scout's criminal assault.</p> <p>It could also be said that Augustus interposed on behalf of the scout by preventing his friend Woodrow from exceeding his moral authority: Yes, Dixon deserved a stout beating, but killing him outright would have been disproportionate."</p> <p>The US needs to understand that it should intervene when israels behaviour becomes "dis-proportionate"....</p> <p>Again, go to this site and read this it one of the most vivid examples of what freedom is and what freedom is not.... I LOVE THIS!</p> <p><a href="http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=135#post-313 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:23:50 +0000 smithy 313@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>Please go to this website and read the text about Lonesome Dove and the principle of<br /> interposition. Be sure to watch the Lonesome Dove Clip.</p> <p>This is abolutely beautiful in my humble opinion</p> <p><a href="http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=133#post-311 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:25:23 +0000 smithy 311@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>When it comes to iran you cannot believe western media. iran has been so highly sanctioned during the last 30 years that no person is allowed to speak on irans positive behalf in our mainstream media.</p> <p>Having said all that iran was recently recognized as one of the countries with fastest scientific progress...I doubt that iran would assassinate one of its best nuclear physicists...</p> <p>"</p> <p>It might be the Chinese year of the tiger, but scientifically, 2010 is looking like Iran's year.</p> <p>Scientific output has grown 11 times faster in Iran than the world average, faster than any other country. A survey of the number of scientific publications listed in the Web of Science database shows that growth in the Middle East – mostly in Turkey and Iran – is nearly four times faster than the world average.</p> <p>Science-Metrix, a data-analysis company in Montreal, Canada, has published a detailed report (PDF) on "geopolitical shifts in knowledge creation" since 1980. "Asia is catching up even more rapidly than previously thought, Europe is holding its position more than most would expect, and the Middle East is a region to watch," says the report's author, Eric Archambault.</p> <p>World scientific output grew steadily, from 450,000 papers a year in 1980 to 1,500,000 in 2009. Asia as a whole surpassed North America last year."</p> <p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18546-iran-showing-fastest-scientific-growth-of-any-country.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18546-iran-showing-fastest-scientific-growth-of-any-country.html</a> </p> http://antiwar-talk.com/topic.php?id=133#post-310 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:57:30 +0000 krazkr 310@http://antiwar-talk.com/ <p>So you mean that the other executions committed by the government of Ahmadinejad may be propaganda. Why would a religious nation avowing of ambitions in the justified mercy of Allah take the lives of it's most talented? </p>